FlexiSpot E7
Checked on
Specifications
- Motorized
- Yes
- Dual motor
- Yes
- Min height
- 58 cm
- Max height
- 123 cm
- Desktop width
- 140 cm
- Desktop depth
- 70 cm
- Max load
- 125 kg
- Cable management
- Yes
- Memory presets
- 4 positions
Strengths
- Powerful and stable dual motor
- Handy 4-position memory presets for daily use
- Wide height adjustment range
- Built-in cable management
Weaknesses
- Assembly instructions could be better
- 140x70 cm top is tight for three screens
Our review
With 58 cm at its lowest position and 123 cm at the top, the FlexiSpot E7 covers a range few competitors reach, usable from 1m60 to 1m95 tall users. The dual motor handles 125 kg without the top moving, and four memory presets sit on the control box. At 480 EUR and 4.6/5 over 3,200 reviews, it is the mid-range benchmark to beat, assembly manual aside.
Frequently asked questions
What height range does the FlexiSpot E7 cover?
The desktop travels from 58 to 123 cm, a range of 65 cm. Two motors share the lift, and the controller stores 4 heights, one for sitting and another for standing. The range is wide enough to suit both short and tall users.
How much weight does the FlexiSpot E7 hold?
The desktop is rated for 125 kg. That is enough for two monitors, a tower and the rest of the setup without nearing the limit. On a motorized desk that figure covers everything left on top during each rise and fall. The weight of monitor arms and stands counts towards that total.
How big is the FlexiSpot E7 desktop?
The desktop measures 140 by 70 cm. That is a standard format, suited to one main monitor plus a laptop. The 70 cm of depth let you push the monitor back to a comfortable viewing distance. Cable management is included to keep the cords under the top.
Is the FlexiSpot E7 worth 171 euros?
At 171 euros it scores 4.6/5 across 3,200 Amazon reviews. That is one of the best scores in the category. We gave it our Best value for money label in the selection. Main strength: powerful and stable dual motor. Main compromise: assembly instructions could be better.